Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://ir.lib.seu.ac.lk/handle/123456789/7135
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorNik Zulkiflia, Nik Mohd Hafizullah-
dc.contributor.authorMunas, Fathima Rehana-
dc.contributor.authorAbdul Hamid, Hamdan-
dc.contributor.authorIshake, Mohamad Khairi-
dc.contributor.authorIsmail, Mohd Azmi-
dc.date.accessioned2024-09-25T09:57:05Z-
dc.date.available2024-09-25T09:57:05Z-
dc.date.issued2024-08-31-
dc.identifier.citationASEAN Engineering Journal 14:3 (2024) 23–28en_US
dc.identifier.issn2586–9159-
dc.identifier.urihttp://ir.lib.seu.ac.lk/handle/123456789/7135-
dc.description.abstractFull-surface fire on fuel storage tank emits high radiation heat transfer. As a fire protection strategy, the water curtain cooling system is activated to reduce the temperature on the adjacent tank surface. Therefore, the present work predicts and analyses the radiation heat flux and the maximum flame temperature of different types of fuels. Further, this analyses the effect of fuel total mass on radiation heat flux and maximum flame temperature and observes the effect of distance between two tanks on radiation heat flux distribution. The relationship between water cooling flow rate and outlet water temperature that absorbed radiation heat flux has been studied. The study has been conducted by using the Consequence modeling software trial version. The modeling setup of the tank is 17 m in height with 65 m inner diameter, and the meteorological data used are 5.4 m/s wind speed with north wind direction at atmospheric pressure in order to imitate the worst-case fire scenario. The results reveal that the gasoline fuel emitted the highest heat flux value of 11.03 kW/m2 and the raw gasoline sample emits the lowest heat flux value of 9.14 kW/m2. Furthermore, the total mass of the fuel shows no effect on the maximum flame temperature of 958.51°C. According to the findings, the critical tank distancing is 36 m and thus the appropriate tank distancing of 40 m is highly recommended by the standard. The result shows that the water cooling rate of 4.1 lpm/m2 is an excellent practice of water cooling to cool down the temperature of the fuel tank which is exposed to radiation heat flux.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherUniversiti Teknologi Malaysiaen_US
dc.subjectFireen_US
dc.subjectFuel storage tanken_US
dc.subjectHeat fluxen_US
dc.subjectRadiationen_US
dc.subjectWater coolingen_US
dc.titlePerformance of water cooling for radiation heat flux fuel storage tanken_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:Research Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
3.+AEJ+Vol+14.3+2024_nik.pdf527.97 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.