Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://ir.lib.seu.ac.lk/handle/123456789/7135
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Nik Zulkiflia, Nik Mohd Hafizullah | - |
dc.contributor.author | Munas, Fathima Rehana | - |
dc.contributor.author | Abdul Hamid, Hamdan | - |
dc.contributor.author | Ishake, Mohamad Khairi | - |
dc.contributor.author | Ismail, Mohd Azmi | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-09-25T09:57:05Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2024-09-25T09:57:05Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2024-08-31 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | ASEAN Engineering Journal 14:3 (2024) 23–28 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 2586–9159 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://ir.lib.seu.ac.lk/handle/123456789/7135 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Full-surface fire on fuel storage tank emits high radiation heat transfer. As a fire protection strategy, the water curtain cooling system is activated to reduce the temperature on the adjacent tank surface. Therefore, the present work predicts and analyses the radiation heat flux and the maximum flame temperature of different types of fuels. Further, this analyses the effect of fuel total mass on radiation heat flux and maximum flame temperature and observes the effect of distance between two tanks on radiation heat flux distribution. The relationship between water cooling flow rate and outlet water temperature that absorbed radiation heat flux has been studied. The study has been conducted by using the Consequence modeling software trial version. The modeling setup of the tank is 17 m in height with 65 m inner diameter, and the meteorological data used are 5.4 m/s wind speed with north wind direction at atmospheric pressure in order to imitate the worst-case fire scenario. The results reveal that the gasoline fuel emitted the highest heat flux value of 11.03 kW/m2 and the raw gasoline sample emits the lowest heat flux value of 9.14 kW/m2. Furthermore, the total mass of the fuel shows no effect on the maximum flame temperature of 958.51°C. According to the findings, the critical tank distancing is 36 m and thus the appropriate tank distancing of 40 m is highly recommended by the standard. The result shows that the water cooling rate of 4.1 lpm/m2 is an excellent practice of water cooling to cool down the temperature of the fuel tank which is exposed to radiation heat flux. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en_US | en_US |
dc.publisher | Universiti Teknologi Malaysia | en_US |
dc.subject | Fire | en_US |
dc.subject | Fuel storage tank | en_US |
dc.subject | Heat flux | en_US |
dc.subject | Radiation | en_US |
dc.subject | Water cooling | en_US |
dc.title | Performance of water cooling for radiation heat flux fuel storage tank | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
Appears in Collections: | Research Articles |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
3.+AEJ+Vol+14.3+2024_nik.pdf | 527.97 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.