Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://ir.lib.seu.ac.lk/handle/123456789/7090
Title: | Monitoring urban green space using remote sensing derived vegetation indices in Colombo district, Sri Lanka |
Authors: | Zahir, Ibra Lebbe Mohamed Nuskiya, Mohamed Hassan Fathima Sangasumana, Ven. Pinnawala Iyoob, Athem Lebbe Fowzul Ameer, Meerasa Lewai |
Keywords: | Green space vegetation correlation remote sensing |
Issue Date: | 28-May-2024 |
Publisher: | ELSEVIER |
Citation: | International Symposium on Green Technologies and Applications (ISGTA-2023), Procedia Computer Science 236 (2024); p.248–256. |
Abstract: | This study investigated the use of Remote Sensing (RS)-derived vegetation indices for monitoring urban green spaces (UGSs) from Sentinel-2 RS multispectral imagery with a spatial resolution of up to 10 meters. Six vegetation indices, including the Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI), Enhanced Vegetation Index (EVI), Soil Adjusted Vegetation Index (SAVI), Modified Soil Adjusted Vegetation Index (MSAVI), Green Ratio (GR), and Transformed Vegetation Index (TVI) by using Google Earth Engine (GEE) platform. Derived the original and enhanced images were used to compare the aforementioned vegetation indices in order to assess four image quality parameters: Peak Signal to Noise Ratio (PSNR), Root Mean Square Error (RMSE), Standard Deviation (SD), and Correlation Coefficient (CC). The findings demonstrated the range of values for each vegetation index: NDVI (-0.398163 to 0.888742), EVI (-0.287905 to 0.615649), SAVI (-0.597015 to 1.00000), MSAVI (-0.495483 to 0.795898), GR (-0.199505 to 0.444334), and TVI (0.058906 to 2.32316). Among the indices, MSAVI exhibited the best fit with image quality parameters of PSNR, RMSE, SD, and CC measuring at 45.31, 0.0197, 0.06, and 0.9641, respectively. This outcome suggests MSAVI's better performance in estimating green vegetation areas compared to other indices in the study area. The study also discussed the limitations of using vegetation indexes to monitor UGS, including the influence of atmospheric conditions, sensor calibration, and data preprocessing techniques. Overall, this study is insightful which is valuable in terms of the effectiveness of different vegetation indices for UGS. The findings of this study can be used to inform future |
URI: | http://ir.lib.seu.ac.lk/handle/123456789/7090 |
ISSN: | 1877-0509 |
Appears in Collections: | Research Articles |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
1-s2.0-S1877050924010445-main.pdf | 4.06 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.