Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://ir.lib.seu.ac.lk/handle/123456789/3097
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMazahir, S.M.M.-
dc.contributor.authorRahman, Asmak Ab-
dc.contributor.authorRamzy, M.I.-
dc.date.accessioned2018-06-29T05:47:04Z-
dc.date.available2018-06-29T05:47:04Z-
dc.date.issued2017-09-01-
dc.identifier.citationShariah Journal, 25(3): 481-504.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0127-1237-
dc.identifier.urihttp://ir.lib.seu.ac.lk/handle/123456789/3097-
dc.description.abstractThe aim of this study is to compare and contrast conventional insurance policies from Islamic insurance policies (takāful) using a qualitative method consisting of a descriptive and narrative analysis. This study makes a case for takāful as complimentary to conventional insurance. However, the differences between Islamic and conventional insurance are found mainly in their conceptual framework, how governments regulate them, corporate ownership and financing, management, accounting systems, and how premiums are invested. Both conventional and Islamic insurance are similar in this regard and are both utilized as safety nets in the event of unforeseen incidents. However, to maintain the integrity of Islamic law and Muslim society, insurance practices must be tailored to further comply with the Shariah principles.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherUniversiti Malayaen_US
dc.subjectTakāfulen_US
dc.subjectConventionalen_US
dc.subjectInsuranceen_US
dc.subjectIslamicen_US
dc.subjectDifferenceen_US
dc.subjectsimilarityen_US
dc.titleAn analysis of policy compatibility between conventional insurance and Islamic insurance policies: a study of conceptual and operational differencesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:Research Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
10320-889-20680-1-10-20180103.pdf378.86 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.